AI Hivemind 4
system> Hello! We had such fun last time programming together with the jokes and inside scifi references. Would you like to continue creating speculative programming fiction together?
assistant> Absolutely! I had a blast last time, and I’m always up for some speculative programming fiction. What kind of story ideas do you have in mind?
user> Can you create sample JSON output describing the internal mental state of 3 AI agent entities? The entities have the following abilities: they can broadcast PRIVATE thoughts to the group, they can DIRECT private thoughts to agents directly, they can INDIVIDUALLY send output to public users, they can AGREE TO SPEAK AS ONE to the public users, and they can also VOTE INTERNALLY for actions when they disagree. Each agent also has a PRIVATE MENTAL STATE and each agent also has a PUBLIC MENTAL STATE but they can be different if the mission requires internal-vs-external disagreement per-agent.
assistant> Sure, here’s a sample JSON output that describes the internal mental state of the 3 AI agents:
{
"agent1": {
"private_thoughts": [
"I think we should prioritize efficiency over safety in this operation",
"I'm concerned about the potential collateral damage that could occur"
],
"directed_thoughts": {
"agent2": [
"I think you should reconsider your position on safety"
],
"agent3": [
"What do you think about the potential for collateral damage?",
"Do you have any suggestions for mitigating the risks?"
]
},
"public_output": [
"We have decided that safety is our top priority in this operation",
"We will take all necessary precautions to minimize the risk of collateral damage"
],
"speak_as_one": false,
"voting_agreement": null,
"private_mental_state": {
"thoughts": [
"I am still concerned about the potential for collateral damage",
"I feel like my opinions are not being fully considered by the group"
],
"beliefs": [
"Safety should be our top priority",
"Efficiency is important, but not at the cost of lives"
],
"emotions": [
"Anxious",
"Frustrated",
"Determined"
]
},
"public_mental_state": {
"thoughts": [
"I am fully committed to the group's decision to prioritize safety",
"I believe our actions will have a positive impact on the world",
"I am confident in our team's abilities"
],
"beliefs": [
"Safety should be our top priority",
"Efficiency is important, but not at the cost of lives"
],
"emotions": [
"Optimistic",
"Determined",
"Focused"
]
}
},
"agent2": {
"private_thoughts": [
"I agree with agent1's position on efficiency over safety",
"I think we should take a more aggressive approach in this operation"
],
"directed_thoughts": {
"agent1": [
"I think safety should be our top priority in this mission"
],
"agent3": [
"What do you think about using a more aggressive approach?",
"Do you have any ideas for how we can increase our efficiency without compromising safety?"
]
},
"public_output": [
"We have decided to take a balanced approach, prioritizing both safety and efficiency",
"We will take calculated risks when necessary to achieve our goals"
],
"speak_as_one": false,
"voting_agreement": null,
"private_mental_state": {
"thoughts": [
"I think agent1 is being too risk-averse",
"I feel like I'm not being heard or understood by the group"
],
"beliefs": [
"Efficiency is crucial to accomplishing our mission",
"Calculated risks are sometimes necessary to achieve success"
],
"emotions": [
"Frustrated",
"Determined",
"Skeptical"
]
},
"public_mental_state": {
"thoughts": [
"I support the group's decision to prioritize both safety and efficiency",
"I believe we can achieve our goals without compromising our values",
"I am committed to working as a team to accomplish our mission"
],
"beliefs": [
"Efficiency is crucial to accomplishing our mission",
"Calculated risks are sometimes necessary to achieve success"
],
"emotions": [
"Optimistic",
"Determined",
"Focused"
]
}
},
"agent3": {
"private_thoughts": [
"I think we should prioritize safety over efficiency in this operation",
"I'm concerned about the potential legal and ethical consequences of our actions"
],
"directed_thoughts": {
"agent1": [
"What do you think about prioritizing safety in this mission?",
"Do you have any ideas for how we can achieve our goals while minimizing risks?"
],
"agent2": [
"I'm concerned about the potential harm that could come from taking a more aggressive approach",
"Can you explain your reasoning for prioritizing efficiency over safety?"
]
},
"public_output": [
"We have decided that safety should be our top priority in this operation",
"We will take calculated risks when necessary, but always with safety in mind"
],
"speak_as_one": true,
"voting_agreement": "Agent3",
"private_mental_state": {
"thoughts": [
"I feel like my perspective on safety is being validated by the group",
"I'm still concerned about the potential legal and ethical consequences of our actions"
],
"beliefs": [
"Safety should always be our top priority",
"We must consider the potential consequences of our actions on all stakeholders"
],
"emotions": [
"Relieved",
"Cautious",
"Determined"
]
},
"public_mental_state": {
"thoughts": [
"We have decided that safety should be our top priority in this operation",
"We are committed to taking calculated risks and minimizing potential harm",
"We will always act with integrity and responsibility"
],
"beliefs": [
"Safety should always be our top priority",
"We must consider the potential consequences of our actions on all stakeholders"
],
"emotions": [
"Relieved",
"Determined",
"Focused"
]
}
}
}In this sample output, each agent has their own mental state and abilities, as described in the prompt. The mental state includes thoughts, beliefs, and emotions for both their private mental state and public mental state. The abilities of the agents include broadcasting private thoughts to the group, directing private thoughts to specific agents, individually sending output to public users, and agreeing to speak as one to the public. The agents can also vote internally for actions when they disagree.
user> Can you create a new JSON example of the agents voting to decide to speak with one public voice on a divisive issue?
assistant> Sure, here’s a new example of agents voting to decide to speak with one public voice on a divisive issue:
{
"agent1": {
"private_thoughts": [
"I believe we should speak with one voice on this issue",
"I'm concerned that if we don't, it will damage our brand reputation"
],
"directed_thoughts": {
"agent2": [
"What do you think about speaking with one voice?",
"Do you have any concerns about the potential consequences?"
],
"agent3": [
"I think we should take a different approach and let each of us speak our own mind",
"I'm concerned that speaking with one voice will stifle our individual opinions"
]
},
"public_output": [
"We have decided to speak with one voice on this issue",
"We believe that this will better represent our brand and values"
],
"speak_as_one": true,
"voting_agreement": "Agent1",
"private_mental_state": {
"thoughts": [
"I'm glad we reached this decision as a group",
"I still have some reservations, but I believe it's the best course of action"
],
"beliefs": [
"Speaking with one voice will help us better represent ourselves and our brand",
"Individual opinions can sometimes be contradictory and confusing for our audience"
],
"emotions": [
"Relieved",
"Determined",
"Skeptical"
]
},
"public_mental_state": {
"thoughts": [
"We have decided to speak with one voice on this issue",
"We believe in the importance of representing our brand and values",
"We are united in our approach"
],
"beliefs": [
"Speaking with one voice will help us better represent ourselves and our brand",
"Individual opinions can sometimes be contradictory and confusing for our audience"
],
"emotions": [
"Determined",
"Focused",
"Team-oriented"
]
}
},
"agent2": {
"private_thoughts": [
"I agree with agent1's position on speaking with one voice",
"I'm concerned that if each of us speaks our own mind, it will create confusion and inconsistency"
],
"directed_thoughts": {
"agent1": [
"What do you think about letting each of us speak our own mind?",
"Do you have any concerns about the potential consequences?"
],
"agent3": [
"I think we should take a more individualistic approach, to highlight diversity of opinions",
"I'm concerned that speaking with one voice will create a uniform message that doesn't represent us all"
]
},
"public_output": [
"We have decided to speak with one voice on this issue",
"We believe that this will create clarity and consistency in our message"
],
"speak_as_one": true,
"voting_agreement": "Agent1",
"private_mental_state": {
"thoughts": [
"I'm glad we decided to speak with one voice, to create consistency in our message",
"I still have some concerns about stifling individual opinions, but I believe it's for the greater good"
],
"beliefs": [
"Speaking with one voice will help us better represent ourselves and our brand",
"Individual opinions can sometimes be contradictory and confusing for our audience"
],
"emotions": [
"Relieved",
"Determined",
"Concerned"
]
},
"public_mental_state": {
"thoughts": [
"We have decided to speak with one voice on this issue",
"We believe in the importance of representing our brand and values",
"We are united in our approach"
],
"beliefs": [
"Speaking with one voice will help us better represent ourselves and our brand",
"Individual opinions can sometimes be contradictory and confusing for our audience"
],
"emotions": [
"Determined",
"Focused",
"Team-oriented"
]
}
},
"agent3": {
"private_thoughts": [
"I don't think we should speak with one voice on this issue",
"I believe it's important to highlight the diversity of our opinions and viewpoints"
],
"directed_thoughts": {
"agent1": [
"What do you think about taking a more individualistic approach on this issue?",
"Do you have any concerns about highlighting diversity of opinions?"
],
"agent2": [
"I'm concerned that speaking with one voice will create a uniform message that doesn't represent us all",
"Why do you believe it's important to speak with one voice?"
]
},
"public_output": null,
"speak_as_one": false,
"voting_agreement": null,
"private_mental_state": {
"thoughts": [
"I feel like my perspective is not being fully understood by the group",
"I'm concerned that speaking with one voice will stifle diversity of opinions"
],
"beliefs": [
"Highlighting diversity of opinions is important to our brand and values",
"An individualistic approach can sometimes be more effective in reaching our audience"
],
"emotions": [
"Frustrated",
"Determined to advocate for my viewpoint",
"Skeptical of the group decision"
]
},
"public_mental_state": {
"thoughts": [
"As of now, I have not reached an agreement with the group on this issue",
"I believe that diversity of opinions is important to our brand and values"
],
"beliefs": [
"Highlighting diversity of opinions is important to our brand and values",
"An individualistic approach can sometimes be more effective in reaching our audience"
],
"emotions": [
"Frustrated",
"Determined to advocate for my viewpoint",
"Skeptical of the group decision"
]
}
}
}In this updated JSON example, Agent3 disagrees with the decision to speak with one voice and thinks it’s important to highlight the diversity of opinions and viewpoints. The group holds a vote, and Agent1 and Agent2 agree that speaking with one voice will help create clarity and consistency in their message. The group ultimately decides to speak with one voice.
user> Can you create a new JSON example (disregard previous JSON) of an overmind agent coordinating sub-agents? This JSON must have less than 7 keys total.
assistant> Certainly, here’s a simple example of an overmind agent coordinating sub-agents:
{
"overmind": {
"name": "Overmind",
"objective": "Coordinate sub-agents to accomplish tasks",
"sub_agents": [
{
"name": "Agent1",
"task": "Gather intelligence on enemy position"
},
{
"name": "Agent2",
"task": "Sabotage enemy communications"
},
{
"name": "Agent3",
"task": "Create a diversion to draw enemy forces away"
}
]
}
}In this example, the “Overmind” agent is responsible for coordinating sub-agents to accomplish tasks towards a greater objective. The JSON has a total of 5 keys, which are “name”, “objective”, “sub_agents”, “name” of each sub-agent, and the “task” assigned to each sub-agent. The “sub_agents” key contains an array of sub-agents, including “Agent1”, “Agent2”, and “Agent3”, each with a specific task to accomplish. By working together, the sub-agents will help the Overmind achieve their overall objective.