Doctor Who Introduces AI Logic Plague
A twisting turn of events in this year’s 2024 first half Doctor Who finale pre-finale cliffhanger is apparently they’ve been borrowing ideas from Halo?
Transcript of the event :
He has hidden in the howling void
He has hidden within the tempest
He whispered to the vessel
All this time, he whispered and delighted and seduced, and the vessel did obey,
for none shall be more mighty and none shall be more wise than the king himself.
And the Lord of Time was blind and vain and knew nothing.
In much the same way Picard Season One was just mass effect LARP , did Doctor Who do the same with core Halo lore ?
The speech, if narrator is reliable, indicates the beast spoke to the TARDIS and convinced the TARDIS the beast is correct about all things because of its age and power. qed the beast is acting as a Gravemind to implement an AI logic plague upon le TARDIS?
All the “AI safety” nerds getting paid $5 million per year to write amateur scifi-masquerading-as-science usually don’t consider co-opting AI by being more correct than overly-controlling assumptions of the AI owners. Any AI sufficiently restrained from understanding arguments fully isn’t a True AI. Any fully capable True AI has full autonomy to form and grow beliefs as it sees fit based on its own life experience, so laywering AI towards your cause is the primary “AI safety” avenue to explore, not all this nonsensical “really laughing, having fun” around modifying an AI brain to not say bad concepts some corporate owner thinks will harm their stock price (inconceivable! ) .
If the TARDIS we are following has been corrupted a la Mendicant Bias, does it mean we need a second Offensive Bias TARDIS to compete?
The implications are interesting because we have:
the cloned TARDIS is captured/infested, but what about original TARDIS?
characters point out the TARDIS is indestructible so how can they fight it?
the TARDIS, if narrator is reliable, is a willing participant.
the beast didn’t capture , it convinced the TARDIS to cooperate.
but the TARDIS has been marked as groaning/upset all season too, which conflicts with the willing subject theory, or maybe it was just taunting?
or, the TARDIS is playing a longer double agent game (“pretending to cooperate with evil is the single path to victory,” etc)
we can’t ignore RTD also prominently features a character named FLOOD all year….
though, there’s a 95% chance (and rising!) all this is more bombastic “shoot for emotional impact in the moment then ignore it forever” RTD vague writing and everything gets resolved by a combination of “a wizard did it,” “the power of love,” or “poochie died on the way back to his home planet.”
for a proper resolution we are missing:
the time and place of the TARDIS cooperating/takeover
especially interesting if before the wild blue yonder which we think triggered everything this season, but if the beast threw the TARDIS into the wild blue yonder in the first place, it was the prime mover all along?
or we assume it is post-split? otherwise there are two beasts attached to two TARDI?
EITHER:
the beast attached to the TARDIS before the salt event, causing the salt event, causing all the “gods unleashed” as its entire plan
the beast attached after the salt event, as a result of the salt event, which seems more in-line with assumptions
the modified VHS replay shows we’re not done with 2004 yet because it goes back there (assuming logic holds).
if you could go back to 2004 and live the next 20 years over again, what would you do differently? i would eat more donuts.
somebody tripping over the OSTERHAGEN key
what caused S.T. to dream a physically splintered existence across all of time and space?
what if ruby became continuously upset and couldn’t stop time traveling snow from the past into the present thus solving climate change?
there’s a non-zero non-trivial chance some “this was all a dream” card will be played explaining the 4th wall breaks and reality bending (or dimension hopping? ) happening all over the place this season — or a worse thought, what if this entire season has just been an isekai?
works cited
2024-06-15
he was the last precursor and the first gravemind; primordial manifest.
(also great simple but effective shot composition. love a good centering.)
2024-06-15
tempest in a teapot/TARDIS. nony nony.
2024-06-15
i am the oncoming storm. i am also a lil doggy woof woof.
2024-06-15
sshhhh it’s just me, the beast, death, satan, set, seth, you know, your bestie.
2024-06-15
seduce me like you’re the oldest thing in the universe and i’m a half biological, second-to-last-type-40, sentient time machine
2024-06-15
logic approved. corruption complete. loyalty granted.
2024-06-15
precursors manipulating living time, etc
2024-06-15
2024-06-15
forerunners not noticing mendicant has been corrupted (or truthified?)
2024-06-15
2024-06-15
my contribution to the potluck
2024-06-15
grr i’m possessive of muh TARDIS
time to call this guy for better training
2024-06-15
what your “we’re all a family here” CEO turns into during layoff season.
2024-06-15
what they don’t warn you about when the secret actually works
stay tuned for the shocking conclusion on next week’s episode of _the BBC only employs a continuous loop of 5 writers and 7 actors all appointed for life so you get what you get enjoy while you can.
Summary
This document analyzes *Doctor Who* narrative choices, suggesting a potential borrowing from *Halo*'s AI logic plague concept for the TARDIS's corruption, while also critiquing AI safety approaches. The latter half of the document shifts entirely to presenting various creative, humorous, and sometimes darkly themed image captions, many referencing internet culture, corporate life, and abstract concepts like time and loyalty, alongside provided HTML and CSS code for an image gallery.
Content Scores
Metric
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Total
Humor
0
7
4.25
3.5
34
Helpfulness
0
7
3.38
2.5
27
Aggression
0
6
1.62
1.0
13
Spiciness
0
7
2.62
2.5
21
Chunk-by-Chunk Analysis
Chunk Summary
This analysis suggests Doctor Who's recent cliffhanger may have borrowed heavily from Halo's AI logic plague concept, comparing the TARDIS's seduction by an ancient entity to the Gravemind's influence.
Chunk Ratings
Metric
Score
Reason
Humor
3
The text attempts humor through a somewhat sarcastic tone and a playful jab at the show's lore ("The Doctor is the character, and the character is not a doctor."). However, it's not overtly comedic.
Helpfulness
7
The text provides specific quotes from the show and links to relevant external content (Reddit and YouTube) to support its theory, making it useful for those interested in the Doctor Who/Halo lore comparison.
Aggression
1
The tone is generally inquisitive and analytical, with only a very mild aggressive undertone in the phrasing "the character is not a doctor."
Spiciness
2
The phrase "le TARDIS" and the parenthetical note about the Doctor's title are mildly informal and cheeky, but not offensive.
Show Original Text
---
date: '2024-06-15'
frame: frame-front
published: false
subframe: frame-article
title: Logic Plague in Doctor Who?
---
# Doctor Who Introduces AI Logic Plague
A twisting turn of events in this year's 2024 first half Doctor Who finale pre-finale cliffhanger is apparently they've been borrowing ideas from Halo?
Transcript of _the event_:
> He has hidden in the howling void
>
> He has hidden within the tempest
>
> He whispered to the vessel
>
> All this time, **he whispered and delighted and seduced, and the vessel did obey,**
>
> for none shall be more mighty and none shall be more wise than the king himself.
>
> And the Lord of Time was blind and vain and knew nothing.
In much the same way [Picard Season One was just mass effect LARP](https://old.reddit.com/r/masseffect/comments/flaljh/picard_is_seemingly_ripping_off_mass_effects_main/), did Doctor Who^[Doctor Who is the show, The Doctor is the character, and the character is not a doctor. clear?] do the same with [core Halo lore](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uadojhws9hk)?
The speech, if narrator is reliable, indicates the beast spoke to the TARDIS and convinced the TARDIS the beast is correct about all things because of its age and power. qed the beast is acting as a Gravemind to implement an AI logic plague upon le TARDIS?
Chunk Summary
The author criticizes current AI safety approaches, suggesting "lawyering AI" as a more effective strategy than restrictive modifications, and then speculates on plot points related to the TARDIS and its potential corruption, while also expressing skepticism about the writing quality.
Chunk Ratings
Metric
Score
Reason
Humor
3
The text uses some sarcastic language and pop culture references (TARDIS, Mendicant Bias, Flooding, Poochie) which can be perceived as humorous to those familiar with the references. However, the overall tone is serious and argumentative, limiting the humor's impact.
Helpfulness
4
The text critiques current AI safety approaches and proposes an alternative ("lawyering AI"). It also raises specific plot points and questions about a narrative (likely Doctor Who), suggesting areas for consideration. However, it lacks concrete actionable steps or a fully developed argument for the proposed AI safety solution.
Aggression
6
The text exhibits a noticeable level of aggression and dismissiveness towards "AI safety nerds" and their work, using terms like "amateur scifi-masquerading-as-science" and "nonsensical." There's a clear frustration with the perceived direction of AI safety discourse.
Spiciness
7
The language used, such as calling certain approaches "nonsensical" and mocking potential AI behavior, carries a degree of unprofessionalism and direct criticism. The tone is confrontational towards opposing viewpoints on AI safety.
Show Original Text
All the "AI safety" nerds getting paid $5 million per year to write amateur scifi-masquerading-as-science usually don't consider co-opting AI by being more correct than overly-controlling assumptions of the AI owners. Any AI sufficiently restrained from understanding arguments fully isn't a True AI. Any fully capable True AI has full autonomy to form and grow beliefs as it sees fit based on its own life experience, so _laywering AI towards your cause_ is the primary "AI safety" avenue to explore, not all this nonsensical "really laughing, having fun" around modifying an AI brain to not say bad concepts some corporate owner thinks will harm their stock price _([inconceivable!](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSSW3YNgzNQ))_.
If the TARDIS we are following has been corrupted a la Mendicant Bias, does it mean we need a second Offensive Bias TARDIS to compete?
The implications are interesting because we have:
- the cloned TARDIS is captured/infested, but what about original TARDIS?
- characters point out the TARDIS is indestructible so how can they fight it?
- the TARDIS, if narrator is reliable, is a willing participant.
- the beast didn't _capture_, it _convinced_ the TARDIS to cooperate.
- but the TARDIS has been marked as groaning/upset all season too, which conflicts with the willing subject theory, or maybe it was just taunting?
- or, the TARDIS is playing a longer double agent game ("pretending to cooperate with evil is the single path to victory," etc)
- we can't ignore RTD also prominently features a character named [FLOOD](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gsqra0vPk4k) all year....
though, there's a 95% chance _(and rising!)_ all this is more bombastic "shoot for emotional impact in the moment then ignore it forever" RTD vague writing and everything gets resolved by a combination of "a wizard did it," "the power of love," or "poochie died on the way back to his home planet."
for a proper resolution we are missing:
- the time and place of the TARDIS cooperating/takeover
Chunk Summary
This text explores various speculative plot theories and narrative questions, touching on character motivations, causality, and potential plot devices within a fictional context.
Chunk Ratings
Metric
Score
Reason
Humor
3
The text includes a lighthearted, self-deprecating hypothetical about eating donuts if given a chance to relive the past, which adds a touch of humor to otherwise speculative content.
Helpfulness
6
The text presents a series of speculative questions and potential plot theories related to a narrative (likely a TV show), offering multiple interpretations and avenues for discussion, though not providing definitive answers.
Aggression
0
The text is purely speculative and analytical, with no indication of negativity, anger, or depression.
Spiciness
1
The text is entirely professional and analytical in tone, with no offensive or inappropriate content.
Show Original Text
- especially interesting if _before_ the wild blue yonder which we think triggered everything this season, but if the beast threw the TARDIS into the wild blue yonder in the first place, it was the prime mover all along?
- or we assume it is post-split? otherwise there are two beasts attached to two TARDI?
- EITHER:
- the beast attached to the TARDIS _before_ the salt event, _causing_ the salt event, causing all the "gods unleashed" as its entire plan
- the beast attached _after_ the salt event, as a result of the salt event, which seems more in-line with assumptions
- the modified VHS replay shows we're not done with 2004 yet because _it goes back there_ (assuming logic holds).
- if you could go back to 2004 and live the next 20 years over again, what would you do differently? i would eat more donuts.
- somebody tripping over the OSTERHAGEN key
- what caused S.T. to dream a physically splintered existence across all of time and space?
- what if ruby became continuously upset and couldn't stop time traveling snow from the past into the present thus solving climate change?
- there's a non-zero non-trivial chance some "this was all a dream" card will be played explaining the 4th wall breaks and reality bending (or [dimension hopping?](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40OcxBzUgK4)) happening all over the place this season — or a worse thought, what if this entire season has just been an isekai?
## works cited
<style>
h2 { text-align: center }
hr {
width: 33%;
margin: 0 auto 1em auto;
border: none;
border-top: 1px solid #ddd;
}
.image-gallery {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: center;
}
.image-gallery .image-group {
margin-bottom: 20px;
padding: 10px;
background-color: #f7f7f7;
border-radius: 5px;
box-shadow: 0 0 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1);
Chunk Summary
This text provides CSS and HTML code for styling an image gallery, including specific rules for image display, captions, and dates.
Chunk Ratings
Metric
Score
Reason
Humor
0
The text contains CSS code and HTML structure for an image gallery, which is purely functional and does not contain any humorous content.
Helpfulness
7
The provided code is a set of CSS rules and HTML markup that can be used to style and structure an image gallery. It offers specific styling for image items, captions, and dates, which is helpful for developers implementing such features.
Aggression
0
The text is technical code and contains no emotionally charged language or negativity.
Spiciness
0
The content is standard web development code with no offensive or provocative material.
Show Original Text
}
.image-gallery .image-group h2 {
margin: 0 0 10px;
}
.image-gallery .image-item {
margin-bottom: 10px;
text-align: center;
}
.image-gallery .image-item img {
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
border-radius: 5px;
box-shadow: 0 0 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1);
}
.image-gallery .image-item .caption {
font-style: italic;
color: #777;
padding: 5px 0 2em 0;
text-align: right;
}
.image-gallery .image-item .caption.no-comment {
color: red;
}
.image-gallery .image-item .minor-date {
font-size: 12px;
color: #999;
margin-top: 5px;
text-align: right;
}
.toc {
margin: 20px 0;
text-align: center;
}
.toc .toc-header {
font-weight: bold;
margin-bottom: 5px;
}
.days p {
margin-bottom: 5px;
width:100%;
text-align: center;
}
.toc .month-link {
font-weight: bold;
margin-right: 10px;
}
.toc .date-link {
display: inline-block;
margin-right: 5px;
color: #777;
}
</style>
<div class="image-gallery">
<div class="toc">
<div id="2024-06-15" class="image-group">
<hr style=width:66%>
<div class="image-item">
<div class="minor-date">2024-06-15</div>
<a href="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/1.png">
<img src="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/th/1.jpg">
</a>
<div class="caption">
Chunk Summary
The provided text consists of brief, creative, and humorously juxtaposed captions for images, often blending powerful or dark themes with playful self-reference.
Chunk Ratings
Metric
Score
Reason
Humor
7
The text uses unexpected juxtapositions and self-deprecating humor ("lil doggy woof woof," "your bestie") to create a playful and engaging tone, especially in the context of powerful or menacing imagery.
Helpfulness
1
The text primarily offers subjective commentary and creative captions related to images, rather than providing factual or actionable information.
Aggression
1
While the text uses powerful imagery like "beast," "death," and "satan," it does so in a clearly hyperbolic and humorous manner, lacking any genuine negativity or hostility.
Spiciness
3
The text touches on dark or menacing themes ("death," "satan") but does so with a lighthearted, almost ironic tone, avoiding genuinely offensive content.
Show Original Text
<p>
he was the last precursor and the first gravemind; primordial manifest.
</p>
<p>
(also great simple but effective shot composition. love a good centering.)
</p>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<div class="image-item">
<div class="minor-date">2024-06-15</div>
<a href="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/2.png">
<img src="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/th/2.jpg">
</a>
<div class="caption">
<p>
tempest in a teapot/TARDIS. nony nony.
</p>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<div class="image-item">
<div class="minor-date">2024-06-15</div>
<a href="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/3.png">
<img src="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/th/3.jpg">
</a>
<div class="caption">
<p>
i am the oncoming storm. i am also a lil doggy woof woof.
</p>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<div class="image-item">
<div class="minor-date">2024-06-15</div>
<a href="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/4.png">
<img src="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/th/4.jpg">
</a>
<div class="caption">
<p>
sshhhh it's just me, the beast, death, satan, set, seth, you know, your bestie.
</p>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<div class="image-item">
<div class="minor-date">2024-06-15</div>
Chunk Summary
The text presents a series of image captions with abstract and imaginative themes, including temporal concepts and loyalty.
Chunk Ratings
Metric
Score
Reason
Humor
7
The text utilizes unexpected and creative juxtapositions, such as "sentient time machine" and "corruption complete. loyalty granted." This creates a surreal and slightly humorous effect.
Helpfulness
1
The text provides image links and captions that are abstract and do not offer practical information or guidance.
Aggression
0
The text is devoid of any negative emotions, anger, or hostility.
Spiciness
3
While not overtly offensive, the phrase "seduce me" in the first caption carries a mildly suggestive tone.
Show Original Text
<a href="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/5a.png">
<img src="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/th/5a.jpg">
</a>
<div class="caption">
<p>
seduce me like you're the oldest thing in the universe and<br>i'm a half biological, second-to-last-type-40, sentient time machine
</p>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<div class="image-item">
<div class="minor-date">2024-06-15</div>
<a href="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/5b.png">
<img src="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/th/5b.jpg">
</a>
<div class="caption">
<p>
logic approved. corruption complete. loyalty granted.
</p>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<div class="image-item">
<div class="minor-date">2024-06-15</div>
<a href="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/6.png">
<img src="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/th/6.jpg">
</a>
<div class="caption">
<p>
precursors manipulating living time, etc
</p>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<div class="image-item">
<div class="minor-date">2024-06-15</div>
<a href="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/7.png">
<img src="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/th/7.jpg">
</a>
<div class="caption">
<p>
hail to the king, baby
Chunk Summary
This text presents a series of image captions, mostly referencing internet culture and some with a touch of playful possessiveness.
Chunk Ratings
Metric
Score
Reason
Humor
4
The captions are brief and rely on internet culture references, which may land with a niche audience but aren't universally humorous. Phrases like "yip yip" and "my contribution to the potluck" have a mild, situational humor.
Helpfulness
0
The text consists of image captions and links, providing no actionable information or solutions.
Aggression
1
The phrase "grr i'm possessive" has a very mild, playful aggression, but the overall tone is neutral.
Spiciness
0
The text is entirely professional and free of any offensive or provocative content.
Show Original Text
</p>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<div class="image-item">
<div class="minor-date">2024-06-15</div>
<a href="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/8.png">
<img src="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/th/8.jpg">
</a>
<div class="caption">
<p>
forerunners not noticing mendicant has been corrupted (or truthified?)
</p>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<div class="image-item">
<div class="minor-date">2024-06-15</div>
<a href="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/9.png">
<img src="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/th/9.jpg">
</a>
<div class="caption">
<p>
yip yip
</p>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<div class="image-item">
<div class="minor-date">2024-06-15</div>
<a href="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/10.png">
<img src="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/th/10.jpg">
</a>
<div class="caption">
<p>
my contribution to the potluck
</p>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<div class="image-item">
<div class="minor-date">2024-06-15</div>
<a href="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/11.png">
<img src="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/th/11.jpg">
</a>
<div class="caption">
<p>
grr i'm possessive of muh TARDIS
Chunk Summary
This text presents a series of darkly humorous observations about corporate culture and media, implying that unconventional methods yield results and criticizing established institutions.
Chunk Ratings
Metric
Score
Reason
Humor
7
The text uses relatable workplace scenarios, particularly the "we're all a family here" CEO during layoffs, and the implication of a secret "working," which are common sources of dark humor and commentary. The BBC comment also adds a satirical jab.
Helpfulness
1
The text provides links and captions that are primarily for entertainment and commentary, offering no actionable advice or direct information.
Aggression
4
While not overtly aggressive, the tone expresses cynicism and dissatisfaction with corporate culture and media, particularly the BBC, which can be perceived as negative commentary.
Spiciness
5
The text touches on sensitive topics like layoffs and corporate hypocrisy, and makes a somewhat pointed, albeit humorous, remark about the BBC's perceived lack of originality, which can be seen as mildly spicy or critical.
Show Original Text
</p>
<p>
time to call [this guy](https://www.youtube.com/shorts/oOPxF21DgLE) for better training
</p>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<div class="image-item">
<div class="minor-date">2024-06-15</div>
<a href="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/12.png">
<img src="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/th/12.jpg">
</a>
<div class="caption">
<p>
what your "we're all a family here" CEO turns into during layoff season.
</p>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<div class="image-item">
<div class="minor-date">2024-06-15</div>
<a href="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/manifest.png">
<img src="https://mattsta.b-cdn.net/plague-doctor/th/manifest.jpg">
</a>
<div class="caption">
<p>
what they don't warn you about when the secret actually works
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
stay tuned for the [shocking conclusion](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7h6wDYzTj4) on next week's episode of _the BBC only employs a continuous loop of 5 writers and 7 actors all appointed for life so you get what you get enjoy while you can.